OSFI B-13
B-13 sets OSFI's expectations for technology and cyber risk, in effect since January 1, 2024. Technology and cyber incidents go to OSFI within 24 hours. Third-party arrangements fall under Guideline B-10.
What OSFI's Guideline B-13 and FSRA's IT risk guidance expect of a mutual insurer, which one applies to you, how fast you must report an incident, and how a small team can meet it. Then a 28-point checklist for management and the Board.
It depends on who licenses you. B-13 binds federally regulated insurers. Mutuals incorporated in Ontario answer to FSRA, whose IT risk guidance FSRA itself describes as aligned with B-13. Privacy law applies to everyone.
B-13 sets OSFI's expectations for technology and cyber risk, in effect since January 1, 2024. Technology and cyber incidents go to OSFI within 24 hours. Third-party arrangements fall under Guideline B-10.
FSRA's IT Risk Management Guidance (in effect since April 1, 2024) is its interpretation of the Insurance Act: insurers must achieve its outcomes and notify FSRA of a material IT incident within 72 hours.
Under PIPEDA, a breach that creates a real risk of significant harm must be reported to the Privacy Commissioner and to the people affected, and every breach must be recorded for 24 months.
Outside Ontario, FSRA points to similar guidance from other regulators, such as the BC Financial Services Authority's Information Security Guideline and the AMF's guideline on information and communications technology risk in Québec. This guide is general information, not legal or regulatory advice.
OSFI published B-13 on July 31, 2022, and it took effect on January 1, 2024. It is short and outcome-based: three domains, each with an expected outcome, and 17 principles. OSFI says there is no one-size-fits-all approach, and that the guideline should be applied from a risk-based perspective.
Clear accountability, structures, strategy and a risk framework.
A stable, scalable, resilient environment, kept current.
Protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of technology assets.
The principles above are summarized; read the full guideline for OSFI's wording. B-13 works alongside OSFI's incident reporting advisory and Guideline B-10 on third-party risk.
For insurers incorporated in Ontario, FSRA's IT Risk Management Guidance is an interpretation of the Insurance Act, not just advice: insurers must achieve the desired outcomes of each practice, and FSRA says insurers that cannot demonstrate compliance may face supervisory or enforcement action. Accountability for IT risk rests with the Board.
FSRA's Operational Risk and Resilience guidance (effective June 8, 2026) adds four principles (governance, operational risk identification and assessment, operational risk management, and resilience) and uses them, with the IT guidance, to assess how insurers manage IT and cyber risk.
| Who | Deadline | When it applies | How |
|---|---|---|---|
| OSFI federally regulated | Within 24 hours, or sooner if possible; regular updates after that | Incidents with characteristics such as disruption to critical systems, disaster recovery activated, reported to the Board, a cyber insurance claim started, or rated high or critical. When unsure, OSFI encourages reporting as a precaution. | In writing to OSFI's Technology Risk Division and your Lead Supervisor; a post-incident review afterwards |
| FSRA Ontario-incorporated | As soon as reasonable, no later than 72 hours after determining an IT risk incident has occurred | Material incidents, judged against your own thresholds. FSRA's indicators include significant disruption, exposure of a large amount of confidential data, reporting to the Board or the Privacy Commissioner, and a cyber insurance claim. | FSRA's IT risk incident notification form, by email or its incident portal. FSRA accepts a comparable form issued by another financial regulator. |
| Privacy Commissioner PIPEDA | As soon as feasible | A breach of security safeguards that creates a real risk of significant harm to someone | Report to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, notify affected people, and keep a record of every breach for 24 months |
The practical lesson: decide in advance who makes the call, what "material" means for your mutual, and who drafts each notice. The first hours of an incident are the wrong time to work out which regulator you answer to.
Both regulators allow for size. FSRA describes outcomes rather than methods, to be achieved in a way that suits the size and nature of the business, and says smaller insurers can keep oversight independent through separation of duties and independent review. Here is the order we would work in. This is our practice, not a regulatory requirement.
This is the work ABISOL does as a fractional CISO or fractional CIO for mutuals: ABISOL builds the framework with your team, reports to your Board and oversees your providers, while accountability stays where the regulators expect it. See how ABISOL works with mutual insurers.
Each point names its source. OSFI B-13 and OSFI apply to federally regulated insurers, FSRA to Ontario-incorporated insurers, and PIPEDA to everyone. Your ticks are saved in this browser only.
The free IT Maturity & Cloud Migration Assessment covers governance, operations, vendors and resilience in about 30 minutes. For a Board-ready view, book the complimentary Technology & Cyber Health Check with ABISOL.
It depends on who regulates you. B-13 applies to federally regulated financial institutions, including federally regulated property and casualty insurers. A mutual incorporated in Ontario and licensed by FSRA answers to FSRA, whose IT Risk Management Guidance applies instead. FSRA states that its practices are aligned with OSFI's guideline, so B-13 is a sound benchmark either way. Mutuals in other provinces should check their own regulator's guidance.
Federally regulated: to OSFI within 24 hours, or sooner if possible. Ontario-incorporated: to FSRA as soon as reasonable, and no later than 72 hours after determining that an IT risk incident has occurred, if it is material. For privacy breaches under PIPEDA: to the Privacy Commissioner as soon as feasible when there is a real risk of significant harm. One incident can trigger all of these, and a cyber insurance claim is itself on both OSFI's and FSRA's lists of indicators.
Yes, if it is sized to you. OSFI says there is no one-size-fits-all approach to technology and cyber risk. FSRA's guidance describes outcomes, not methods, so they can be met in a way suited to the size and nature of the business, and its resilience guidance says smaller insurers can achieve independence through separation of duties and independent review.
No. Outsourcing moves the work, not the accountability. FSRA expects the Board to retain accountability for outsourced functions, and OSFI's Guideline B-10 says the institution retains accountability for services outsourced to a third party. You need contracts with audit rights, incident notice and exit plans, and a way to check the provider's controls.
None of these documents requires one. FSRA expects responsibility for IT risk to sit with people of sufficient seniority and expertise, and the Board to remain accountable. One practical model for a lean mutual is an internal accountable executive supported by an experienced fractional CIO or CISO who builds the framework, reports to the Board and oversees the MSP. That is ABISOL's model, not a regulatory requirement.
FSRA's Operational Risk and Resilience guidance for Ontario-incorporated insurers took effect on June 8, 2026. It is approach guidance built on four principles: governance, operational risk identification and assessment, operational risk management, and resilience. FSRA uses it, together with its IT Risk Management Guidance, to assess how insurers manage IT and cyber risk. Its practices are not mandatory, but FSRA says they can reflect whether an insurer has met its obligations.
Read on October 8, 2026. If a source has changed since, the source wins.